Comparison of trained panel and consumers’ methodologies to discriminate chocolate samples based on industry quality control parameters

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5327/fst.21223

Keywords:

flavors, descriptive analysis, check-all-that-apply, multiple factor analysis

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare sensory trained panel and consumers’ characterization of chocolates based on a factory’s quality control attributes. Six chocolates were evaluated by a trained panel using descriptive analysis and consumers using Check-All-That-Apply for chocolate, bitter, alkalinity, acidity, woody, smoked, green, floral, burned, musty, and cocoa flavors. Analysis of variance, multivariate analysis-based reduction of dimensions, and multiple factor analysis were performed. The results show that the trained panel and consumers discriminated chocolate samples differently. Trained accessors characterized chocolates made of cocoa liquor from Rondônia and Bahia and those from organic cocoa from Pará to present chocolate and floral flavors; samples from Pará, Espírito Santo, and Cotê d’Ivoire were associated with alkalinity, acidity, smoked, burnt, cocoa, musty, bitter, green, and astringent flavors. Consumers perceived chocolate made of cocoa from Pará to musty, woody, smoked, and alkalinity flavors; chocolate made of liquor from Espírito Santo to burned, green, and astringent flavors; samples made of cocoa from Bahia and Cotê d’Ivoire were associated with bitterness; and those chocolates with Rondônia and organic sample from Pará were associated with floral, cocoa, and chocolate flavors. Multiple factor analysis indicated that consumers perceived samples close to trained panel when chocolates presented wider attribute intensity profile.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aguiar, L. A., Bobrowski Rodrigues, D., Aparecida Vieira Queiroz, V., Melo, L., & Lacerda de Oliveira, L. (2020). Comparison of two rapid descriptive sensory techniques for profiling and screening of drivers of liking of sorghum breads. Food Research International, 131, 108999. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2020.108999

Alcântara, M., & Freitas-Sá, D. G. C. (2018). Rapid and versatile sensory descriptive methods – an updating of sensory science. Brazilian Journal of Food Technology, 21, e2016179. https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-6723.17916

Alexi, N., Nanou, E., Lazo, O., Guerrero, L., Grigorakis, K., & Byrne, D. V. (2018). Check-All-That-Apply (CATA) with semi-trained assessors: Sensory profiles closer to descriptive analysis or consumer elicited data? Food Quality and Preference, 64, 11-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2017.10.009

Ares, G., Antúnez, L., Bruzzone, F., Vidal, L., Giménez, A., Pineau, B., Beresford, M. K., Jin, D., Paisley, A. G., Chheang, S. L., Roigard, C. M., & Jaeger, S. R. (2015). Comparison of sensory product profiles generated by trained assessors and consumers using CATA questions: Four case studies with complex and/or similar samples. Food Quality and Preference, 45, 75-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.05.007

Ares, G., & Jaeger, S. R. (2015). Examination of sensory product characterization bias when check-all-that-apply (CATA) questions are used concurrently with hedonic assessments. Food and Quality Preference, 40(Part A), 199-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.10.004

Cemin, P., Ribeiro, S. R., Oliveira, F. C., Leães, F. L., Nunes, M. R. S., Wagner, R., & Sant’Anna, V. (2022). Chocolates with Brazilian cocoa: Tracking volatile compounds according to consumers’ preference. Food Research International, 159, 111618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2022.111618

Dutcosky, S. D. (2019). Análise sensorial de alimentos (5ª Ed.). Editora PUCPR.

Eghbal, M. (2018). Global chocolate industry: from bean to bar. Retrieved from https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/global-chocolate-industry-from-bean-bar-media-eghbal/?trk=pulse-article_more-articles_related-content-card

Engeseth, N., & Pangan, M. F. A. (2018). Current context on chocolate flavor development—a review. Current Opinion in Food Science, 21, 84-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cofs.2018.07.002

Fortune Business Insights (2020). The global cocoa and chocolate market is projected to grow from $48.29 billion in 2022 to $67.88 billion by 2029, at a CAGR of 4.98% in forecast period. Retrieved from https://www.fortunebusinessinsights.com/industry-reports/cocoa-and-chocolate-market-100075

Jaeger, S. R., Chheang, S. L., Jin, D., Roigard, C. M., & Ares, G. (2020). Check-all-that-apply (CATA) questions: Sensory term citation frequency reflects rated term intensity and applicability. Food Quality and Preference, 86, 103986. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2020.103986

Menezes, A. G. T., Batista, N. N., Ramos, C. L., Silva, A. R. A., Efraim, P., Pinheiro, A. C. M., & Schwan, R. F. (2016). Investigation of chocolate produced from four different Brazilian varieties of cocoa (Theobroma cacao L.) inoculated with Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Food Research International, 81, 83-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2015.12.036

Martinez, S. J., Batista, N. N., Ramos, C. L., Dias, D. R., & Schwan, R. F. (2021). Brazilian cocoa hybrid‐mix fermentation: Impact of microbial dominance as well as chemical and sensorial properties. Journal of Food Science, 86(6), 2604-2614. https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.15758

Moreira, I. M. V., Vilela, L. F., Santos, C., Lima, N., & Schwan, R. F. (2018). Volatile compounds and protein profiles analyses of fermented cocoa beans and chocolates from different hybrids cultivated in Brazil. Food Research International, 109, 196-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2018.04.012

Reinbach, H. C., Giacalone, D., Ribeiro, L. M., Bredie, W. L. P., & Frøst, M. B. (2014). Comparison of three sensory profiling methods based on consumer perception: CATA, CATA with intensity and Napping®. Food Quality and Preference, 32(Part B), 160-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2013.02.004

Toker, O. S., Palabiyik, I., Pirouzian, H. R., Aktar, T., & Konar, N. (2020). Chocolate aroma: Factors, importance and analysis. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 99, 580-592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2020.03.035

Tuenter, E., Delbaere, C., De Winne, A., Bijttebier, S., Custers, D., Foubert, K., Van Durme, J., Messens, K., Dewettinck, K., & Pieters, L. (2020). Non-volatile and volatile composition of West African bulk and Ecuadorian fine-flavor cocoa liquor and chocolate. Food Research International, 130, 108943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2019.108943

Varela, P., & Ares, G. (2018). Recent advances in consumer science. In: G. Ares & P. A. Varela (Eds.), Methods in Consumer Research (v. 1, p. 3-21). Woodhead Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102089-0.00001-7

Vidal, L., Ares, G., & Jaeger, S. R. (2021). Differences in citation proportions in CATA questions can be interpreted as differences perceived intensity of sensory attributes. Journal of Sensory Studies, 36(5), e12695. https://doi.org/10.1111/joss.12695

Wansink, B. (2003). Response to “Measuring consumer responses to food products”. Sensory tests that predict consumer acceptance. Food Quality and Preference, 14(1), 23-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-3293(02)00035-6

Downloads

Published

2023-10-30

How to Cite

CEMIN, P., MORAES, B. K. B. de, & SANT’ANNA, V. (2023). Comparison of trained panel and consumers’ methodologies to discriminate chocolate samples based on industry quality control parameters. Food Science and Technology, 43. https://doi.org/10.5327/fst.21223

Issue

Section

Original Articles